| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 07:31:22 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 03:16:41 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 05:29:08 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98bb7a823fd3d287
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=kgNIk1HPgsD5zyP7_lXLphosl_wbvOe4k_h11FI_Gj8-1759995082-1.0.1.1-C4u8Z8QFBRCkqneiD95ybDAMjCVCyPjeqZwr2e5AOX1PdXqtor7hCks6ISfnBU9xM5fawP6J7oSi1eNXZNzSszk2vR07fMHjhpNaXMl60EM; path=/; expires=Thu, 09-Oct-25 08:01:22 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98bc2d8ba8d3741b-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
Re: [css3-flexbox] Should "overflow: [scroll, hidden, auto]" apply to a flex container? from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2013-02-01 (www-style@w3.org from February 2013)
Re: [css3-flexbox] Should "overflow: [scroll, hidden, auto]" apply to a flex container?
- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 16:29:12 -0800
- To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDtgSVjsBAjfbgzB6=pyq-DKDb8HV0kNVu6YrdjLpagaQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> wrote: > This has been discussed before: > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012May/0438.html Based on the discussion there, I've made Anton's suggested edit and just added a sentence saying that 'overflow' applies to flex containers. Do I need to specify anything further, or is that sufficient? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 1 February 2013 00:30:00 UTC