CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 08:40:23 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:27:13 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 06:56:31 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c437e66e563a30
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=i9L.ZACIcKQiSa2dpuly3u6e4KynmHboOE.Ty8I7Vw4-1760085623-1.0.1.1-.6TCwuXehl7qjDdFz2b9salPu5nmWnot9i2nJBOCNMOjqclJ9Qs1J9jCrmRZhRrnIudxoLESYZvFWa6bnm_XzDMtzZHWAE_44wWtzkuHcrs; path=/; expires=Fri, 10-Oct-25 09:10:23 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98c4d00a8af4c179-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
What are allowable property URIs? from Graham Klyne on 2001-02-14 (www-rdf-interest@w3.org from February 2001)
What are allowable property URIs?
- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 14:23:02 +0000
- To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
- Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010214141547.00a303b0@joy.songbird.com>
At 10:11 PM 2/10/01 -0800, Aaron Swartz wrote: > To re-serialize, you simply break the URI at the first character not > allowed in a Qname (here a /). > >xmlns:a="https://foo.com/" >https://foo.com/nsbar <- a:nsbar > >Sure, the re-serialized graph will not contain the same namespace URIs as >the original, but to an RDF parser this will make no difference. (This will >eventually cause a problem for XML signatures, since the Canonical XML will >be different. Perhaps we need a Canonical RDF? Would it just be a list of >triples?) Reading this made me realize something obvious, but previously overlooked (by me). Not every URI can be used as an RDF property identifier in the RDF syntax. e.g. https://acme.com/property/ The model doesn't have this restriction, that I can see, which suggests a mismatch between model and syntax. Is this on the issues list? Should it be? #g ------------ Graham Klyne (GK@ACM.ORG)
Received on Wednesday, 14 February 2001 10:49:59 UTC