CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 23:02:43 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:28:54 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 07:14:59 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c452ee3cc21aa4
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=cJhuPp.hkfKIw1G.6m_lMAYwxl_15jSzJ41De_htIjk-1760137363-1.0.1.1-2vQpS6BgsKzC4E4oyF3fBKxrrthwRpdRTeqKBdQa598.SjmYqG.UAZXQrxGE7KML1pzi3I2fFLQ0FEZgrQMSPY4NjJZQ1xYAAjzeauhFkXM; path=/; expires=Fri, 10-Oct-25 23:32:43 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98c9bf380d16c1d2-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2003-06-04 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from April to June 2003)
strange treatment of namespaces in RDF/XML
- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 12:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <20030604.122426.25303794.pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
From https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/, Section 5.1 Within RDF/XML documents it is not permitted to use XML namespaces whose namespace URI is either: - the RDF Namespace URI Reference concatenated with additional characters or - the XML Namespace URI Reference concatenated with additional characters. So ... xmlns:xm = "https://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namesp" ... rdf:about="ace#hi" ... is legal, as is ... xmlns:xmx = "https://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace" ... rdf:about="#hi" ... but ... xmlns:xmxx = "https://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace#h" ... rdf:about="i" ... is not. Also, ... xmlns:rd = "https://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-n" ... rdf:about="s#hi" ... is legal, as is ... xmlns:rdf = "https://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" ... rdf:about="hi" ... but ... xmlns:rdx = "https://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#h" ... rdf:about="i" ... is not. Weird. Is this desirable behaviour? Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research Lucent Technologies
Received on Wednesday, 4 June 2003 12:24:37 UTC