| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 07:49:43 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:28:51 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 06:45:41 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98bbeaa50ce97609
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=v7T17uks9rxG1EUhzgZU.O.koA0S54dcDMEZ0spIiuk-1759996183-1.0.1.1-rCNG72i_qBwv59YHLr2ZPIpxbrzmC1W6AOxNAh6lEz1lsaS817c9E6J9Z9tKFnaeqazOCtggkTSlUURmyKQTbBP.Ygl_C4y5CJjeHWRSK6o; path=/; expires=Thu, 09-Oct-25 08:19:43 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98bc48712a30335a-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus from Brian McBride on 2002-02-18 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from January to March 2002)
RDF Issue rdf-terminologicus
- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:54:25 +0000
- To: dehora@acm.org
- Cc: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020218155034.06e92b90@0-mail-1.hpl.hp.com>
Bill, In https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2000Dec/0152.html you raised an issue which was captured in https://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-terminologicus as [[[ Communication and discussion within the community interested in RDF is hampered by lack of a disciplined terminology. It is suggested that a glossary of terms be developed to aid effective communication. This is a general issue for all RDF specifications. ]]] As recorded in https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Feb/0476.html the RDFCore WG resolved: the WG resolves that this issue is addressed by the primer and that this issue be closed. Please could you respond to this message, copying www-rdf-comments@w3.org indicating whether this is an acceptable resolution of this issue. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Monday, 18 February 2002 10:56:00 UTC