CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 23:52:46 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:28:51 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 23:02:36 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c9bf100f81ac87
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=CkAY0DfINLNMmeFsppaMv0Fn6WU1gs1_pcW3QTwoWnw-1760140366-1.0.1.1-v42DbEGzuDF8wBXFtKGcN5QV0sjzQh1lctvAcW4X.v.aILEpo0.CgxezqszJQ8GmCCS21Bm9eCgE0oVNpkNpRgjFLxqOiLDYjIPAvdXekdk; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 00:22:46 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98ca08886ff1a8b0-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
RDF issue rdfms-identity-anon-resources from Brian McBride on 2001-11-01 (www-rdf-comments@w3.org from October to December 2001)
RDF issue rdfms-identity-anon-resources
- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2001 14:12:35 +0000
- To: jonas@paranormal.o.se
- CC: www-rdf-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <3BE15853.1050205@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Jonas, In https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/1999Nov/0115.html you raised an issue with the RDF specifications which was recorded in the RDF Issue tracking document as: https://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources The RDFCore WG has resolved that the RDF model theory draft of 25 September 2001 (https://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/) adequately addresses the issue https://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-identity-anon-resources https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0405.html Whilst the formal resolution refers to the new model theory WD, this might be summed up as: --------- Resources that are described but not named in an XML serialization (by rdf:ID or rdf:about) are represented in an RDF abstract graph by nodes that do not have any associated URI. Such nodes, called bNodes (from blank nodes) are thereby distinguishable from other described resource nodes, which do have an associated URI-reference label. To directly address the question of the issue: a so-called anonymous resource has no URI. To reflect un-named descriptions in N-triples, local names must be introduced (i.e. of the form '_:name'). These names are not URIs, and their scope is the N-triples document in which they appear. In the defined use of RDF to express ground facts, the meaning of bNode is to assert the existence of at least one resource which is the subject and/or object of properties as indicated by the graph. This is covered more formally by the Model Theory section 2. See also the anonymity lemmas in section 3.2. It has been proposed that the RDF graph syntax can be used for form a query, in which bNodes may be interpreted as query variables. This resolution confirms that bNodes can be distinguished from other labelled nodes within the graph syntax, but is silent about if and how the graph syntax might be used to represent a query. ---------- A set of test cases illustrating the resolution can be found at: https://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdfms-identity-anon-resources/ We hope that you will find this resolution satisfactory. Please could you respond to this message, copying to www-rdf-comments@w3.org, whether this resolution does satisfy your concern. Brian McBride RDFCore co-chair
Received on Thursday, 1 November 2001 09:17:08 UTC