| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 12:00:20 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 18:20:29 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sat, 08 Nov 2025 14:44:47 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98bea8739ebccdfa
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=_epJHywldfOuSZB5iAEAzfyQYD8CZeCdIbHrbYPwFIo-1760097620-1.0.1.1-zXtAjwuAFXRu8Tko6QUfN_5U0j6Ah3BWD.42QMkuua2Lf6OwQqXvLi0NpFVaHtXuQE1n9341dtDyhYA5Hjgem7baromyyWq6dtXbhF5mTJk; path=/; expires=Fri, 10-Oct-25 12:30:20 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98c5f4eb79c0dfa6-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
<rdf:li> as a typed node from Brian McBride on 2001-11-14 (w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org from November 2001)
<rdf:li> as a typed node
- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 18:39:50 +0000
- To: rdf core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <3BF2BA76.6080601@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
In the resolution of issues https://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity https://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema the WG decided to allow <rdf:li> elements as typed nodes. This was at the time an arbritary decision, made primarily to ensure that there was a definite answer. There has been implementor feedback that this was not a good decision. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001JulSep/0159.html https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Aug/0122.html The WG will also be considering by Friday issue: https://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-rdf-names-use where it is proposed to disallow names from the RDF namespace in inappropriate contexts, e.g. rdf:Description not be allowed on a property element. I propose o Use of rdf:li is an error o https://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test005.rdf be deleted o that the test cases for rdfms-rdf-names-use should illustrate this error. Brian
Received on Wednesday, 14 November 2001 13:40:20 UTC