| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 04:39:23 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:28:47 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Sun, 09 Nov 2025 14:57:57 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98c6f91f5dd2ea47
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=noXJSwy4x3I5G8HOujzj6NL679SiWYAhtQToUZ0lzZM-1760157563-1.0.1.1-y1jO9TMRBWEcn1Vyba2NIRZmwK8U4UT7Tlk82HeUW3wGnhqs3P0dsPgzaOG1BXDnm.3qqaMLw8wzLaB53piUq.C6StN49_AdkiU.VHBT6Bs; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 05:09:23 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98cbac60fe79c1bd-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
Disambiguate the Conformance statements in WS-A SOAP Binding specification from Prasad Yendluri on 2005-04-07 (public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org from April 2005)
Disambiguate the Conformance statements in WS-A SOAP Binding specification
- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 10:40:17 -0700
- To: public-ws-addressing-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <42557081.4030600@webmethods.com>
WS-Addressing SOAP binding specification has the following statements: "To ensure interoperability with a broad range of devices, all conformant implementations that include support for SOAP 1.2 MUST support the SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module." "To ensure interoperability with a broad range of devices, all conformant implementations that include support for SOAP 1.1 MUST support the SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension." The above could be interpreted to mean, all conformant implementations of SOAP 1.2 MUST support SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module and all conformant implementations of SOAP 1.1 MUST support SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension. I believe that is not the intent. I would ask that these statements be rephrased as follows to eliminate any ambiguity: "To ensure interoperability with a broad range of devices, all comformant implementations of WS-Addressing 1.0 that include support for SOAP 1.2 MUST support the SOAP 1.2 Addressing 1.0 Module" and "To ensure interoperability with a broad range of devices, all comformant implementations of WS-Addressing 1.0 that include support for SOAP 1.1 MUST support the SOAP 1.1 Addressing 1.0 Extension" Regards, Prasad
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:39:13 UTC