| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 07:27:19 GMT
content-type: text/html
content-encoding: gzip
last-modified: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 17:50:22 GMT
cache-control: max-age=2592000, public
expires: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 04:38:10 GMT
vary: Accept-Encoding
access-control-allow-origin: *
x-request-id: 98cbaa9bee1cddc1
strict-transport-security: max-age=15552015; preload
x-frame-options: deny
x-xss-protection: 1; mode=block
cf-cache-status: HIT
set-cookie: __cf_bm=bS3enEsrRmsDxC4RLfbGyIsNoiwRf4Rh4bwvjxVQDX4-1760167639-1.0.1.1-ge4sSGd7AzNPpk53sD_TQCC2lsIJXEtb4lKIs8EJd9f85c_8FA5mUs6LjiyGPPuMDNYg2q_LN_7oai5VkWYjDGECIcazBSsmSpfXWbXHfe4; path=/; expires=Sat, 11-Oct-25 07:57:19 GMT; domain=.w3.org; HttpOnly; Secure; SameSite=None
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 98cca25e6cdf0bc9-BLR
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
[XQuery] A.1.1 Grammar Notes: xml-version from Michael Dyck on 2004-02-16 (public-qt-comments@w3.org from February 2004)
[XQuery] A.1.1 Grammar Notes: xml-version
- From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
- Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:47:25 -0800
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Message-id: <4030212D.E1E33025@ibiblio.org>
XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language
W3C Working Draft 12 November 2003
A.1.1 Grammar Notes
grammar-note: xml-version
"The general rules for [XML 1.1] vs. [XML 1.0], as described in the A.2
Lexical structure section, should be applied to this production."
The phrase "general rules" is vague, and doesn't connect well with
A.2, which doesn't present rules in its discussion of XML versions.
Also, "should be applied to this production" is vague. How about:
An implementation's choice to support the XML 1.0 or 1.1
character set determines the external document from which
to obtain the definition for this production.
But where are the (external) definitions of NCName and QName for
XML 1.1 documents?
Also, XML 1.0 and 1.1 have the same definition for S, so the
gn: xml-version annotation doesn't apply to [11] S.
-Michael Dyck
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2004 20:48:45 UTC