[XQuery] lexical leftovers 3

• From: Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org>
• Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:19:49 -0800
• To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
• Message-id: <402D85C5.3E6D0100@ibiblio.org>

XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language
W3C Working Draft 12 November 2003
Here are some comments from
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qt-comments/2002Aug/0021.html
that did not receive a response from the WG.
------
A.1 EBNF
"The following grammar uses the same Basic Extended Backus-Naur Form
(EBNF) notation as [XML 1.0], except that grammar symbols always have
initial capital letters."
    I still wonder what the reason for this exception is.
    And that isn't the only difference from the notation used in XML.
    In fact, you immediately discuss two others -- the <> terminal
    groupings, and the /**/ production comments. Another is the use (in
    prodns [11,19,21,26]) of references to symbols in other
    specifications. Maybe you could just change "except that" to
    something like "with the following minor differences".
    Also (this isn't actually a leftover comment, but while I'm here):
    there's no reason to capitalize the word "Basic".  The XML spec
    itself uses the word "simple".
    (These comments also apply to a similar sentence in 1 Introduction.)
-----
A.2 Lexical structure
"The rules for calculating these states are given in the A.2.2 Lexical
Rules section."
    No, A.2.2 does not give rules for calculating the states.
-Michael Dyck

Received on Friday, 13 February 2004 21:20:38 UTC