Re: Provenance issue

• From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
• Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 12:17:31 +0100
• To: "public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org" <public-multilingualweb-lt@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <50B4A14B.8070805@w3.org>

And now also to the list ...
- Felix
Am 27.11.12 12:16, schrieb Felix Sasaki:
> Hi Jirka,
>
> my bad. Do you want to change the attribute list, e.g.
> "A personPointer or personRefPointer attribute that implement the 
> human provenance information."
> to
> "A personPointer or personRefPointer attribute that contains a 
> relative selector pointing to a node that implements the human 
> provenance information."
>
> I think that should fix this?
>
> - Felix
>
> Am 27.11.12 12:07, schrieb Jirka Kosek:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm just trying to implement provenance into schema. There seems to be
>> some incosistencies in definition.
>>
>> All attributes on provRule element are defined as
>>
>> "A string or an IRI (only for the Ref attributes)"
>>
>> But as all of such attributes are ending woitj ...Pointer they should
>> have *relative selector* type. Am I right?
>>
>>                 Jirka
>>
>

Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 11:18:00 UTC