Cover the case when primary pointer is removed #50

NavidZ · 2016-03-24T15:45:13Z

To address #48:

Reword a note in primary pointer section to also cover the
case of primary pointer being removed under the scenarios
that user agent may fire pointer events with no primary one.

scottgonzalez · 2016-03-24T17:31:49Z

Looks good.

patrickhlauke · 2016-03-24T19:17:10Z

LGTM. Rick/Jacob?

mustaqahmed · 2016-03-29T12:43:17Z

index.html

 				<div class="note">In the case where there are multiple <a href="#the-primary-pointer">primary pointers</a>, 
 these pointers will all produce <a>compatibility mouse events</a>.</div>
-				<div class="note">On some platforms, the primary pointer is determined using all active pointers on the device, including those not targeted at the user agent (e.g. in another application). This means it is possible for the user agent to fire pointer events in which no pointer is marked as a primary pointer.  For example, if the first touch interaction is targeted outside the user agent and a secondary (multi-touch) touch interaction is targeted inside the user agent, then the user agent may fire pointer events for the second contact with a value of <code>false</code> for <code>isPrimary</code>.</div>
+				<div class="note">In some cases, it is possible for the user agent to fire pointer events in which no pointer is marked as a primary pointer. For instance, when there are multiple active pointers of a particular type like multi-touch and the primary pointer is removed (e.g. it leaves the screen). Also on some platforms, the primary pointer is determined using all active pointers on the device, including those not targeted at the user agent (e.g. in another application). For example, if the first touch interaction is targeted outside the user agent and a secondary (multi-touch) touch interaction is targeted inside the user agent, then the user agent may fire pointer events for the second contact with a value of <code>false</code> for <code>isPrimary</code>.</div>


"For instance, when there are multiple...screen), there will be no primary pointers."

I think the use of "for example" within one case of "for instance" should be avoided for clarity, otherwise the second sentence ("For example, ...") in the second example can possibly appear as the overall third example. Should we use bullets? Or does the following sound clearer?
"... Also on the platforms where the primary pointer is determined using all active pointers on the device (including those targeted at an application other than the user agent), if the first touch interaction is ..."

Reword a note in primary pointer section to also cover the case of primary pointer being removed under the scenarios that user agent may fire pointer events with no primary one.

mustaqahmed · 2016-04-04T15:57:13Z

LGTM.

RByers · 2016-04-14T23:45:18Z

Sorry for the delay, looks good to me too - thanks!

mustaqahmed reviewed Mar 29, 2016
View reviewed changes

Cover the case when primary pointer is removed

f903a90

Reword a note in primary pointer section to also cover the case of primary pointer being removed under the scenarios that user agent may fire pointer events with no primary one.

NavidZ force-pushed the primarypointerremoved branch from 3a2ac5a to f903a90 Compare March 29, 2016 15:11

patrickhlauke merged commit 00ab102 into w3c:gh-pages Apr 4, 2016

NavidZ deleted the primarypointerremoved branch July 27, 2016 15:53

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Cover the case when primary pointer is removed #50

Cover the case when primary pointer is removed #50

Uh oh!

NavidZ commented Mar 24, 2016

Uh oh!

scottgonzalez commented Mar 24, 2016

Uh oh!

patrickhlauke commented Mar 24, 2016

Uh oh!

mustaqahmed Mar 29, 2016

Uh oh!

mustaqahmed commented Apr 4, 2016

Uh oh!

RByers commented Apr 14, 2016

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Cover the case when primary pointer is removed #50

Cover the case when primary pointer is removed #50

Uh oh!

Conversation

NavidZ commented Mar 24, 2016

Uh oh!

scottgonzalez commented Mar 24, 2016

Uh oh!

patrickhlauke commented Mar 24, 2016

Uh oh!

mustaqahmed Mar 29, 2016

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mustaqahmed commented Apr 4, 2016

Uh oh!

RByers commented Apr 14, 2016

Uh oh!

Uh oh!