You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A comparison of some conformal quantile regression methods
We compare two recently proposed methods that combine ideas from conformal inference and
quantile regression to produce locally adaptive and marginally valid prediction intervals under
sample exchangeability.
Accompanying paper:
Matteo Sesia and Emmanuel J. Candes, "A comparison of some conformal quantile regression methods", 2019. arXiv:1909.05433
The methods we are comparing are described in:
Yaniv Romano, Evan Patterson, and Emmanuel J. Candes, "Conformalized quantile regression", 2019.
Danijel Kivaranovic, Kory D. Johnson, and Hannes Leeb, "Adaptive, Distribution-Free Prediction Intervals for Deep Neural Networks", 2019.
STAR: C.M. Achilles, Helen Pate Bain, Fred Bellott, Jayne Boyd-Zaharias, Jeremy Finn, John Folger, John Johnston, and Elizabeth Word. Tennessee’s Student Teacher Achievement Ratio (STAR) project, 2008.
Data subject to copyright/usage rules
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MPES) data can be downloaded using the code in the folder /get_meps_data/ under this repository. It is based on this explanation (code provided by IBM's AIF360).
MEPS_19: Medical expenditure panel survey, panel 19.
MEPS_20: Medical expenditure panel survey, panel 20.
MEPS_21: Medical expenditure panel survey, panel 21.
License
This project is licensed under the MIT License - see the LICENSE file for details.
About
A comparison of some conformal quantile regression methods.