Interesting - why is this passing with our current compilers? Are newer versions of Clang noticing this?

Regardless, change looks like a slam dunk. ⛹️

Interesting - why is this passing with our current compilers? Are newer versions of Clang noticing this?

Regardless, change looks like a slam dunk. ⛹️

I believe there is a bug in MSVC where using a static member of a deprecated struct does not generate a warning, see Godbolt.

I reported this issue on DevCom-10946291. Before MSVC fixes it, the _CXX20_DEPRECATE_VOLATILE macro had no effect.

Bad news: MSVC can generate warnings, but enabling /w14996 or /W3 manually is required. By default, MSVC does not respect [[deprecated]].

Oh, I expect /W3 as an absolute minimum of effort from users (I also believe it's the IDE default). /W1 and /W2 are jokes.

I found that even with /W3, MSVC doesn't respect the [[deprecated]] attribute of template specializations.

template <typename T>
struct foo_trait
{
    static inline constexpr bool value = false;
};
template <typename T>
struct [[deprecated]] foo_trait<const T>
{
    static inline constexpr bool value = true;
};
int main()
{
    static_assert(foo_trait<const int>::value);
}

I re-reported it as DevCom-10948908.

I'm mirroring this to the MSVC-internal repo - please notify me if any further changes are pushed.

⚠️ 🐈 ⚠️