You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I formalize a commonly-used estimator for the effects of spatially-targeted treatment with geocoded microdata.
This estimator compares units immediately next to treatment to units slightly further away. I introduce intuitive
identifying assumptions for the average treatment effect among affected units and illustrate problems when these
assumptions fail. I propose a new method that allows for nonparametric estimation following methods introduced in
Cattaneo et al. (2019) that allows estimation without requiring knowledge of exactly how far treatment effects are
experienced. Since treatment effects can change with distance, the proposed estimator improves estimation by
estimating a treatment effect curve.
Replication
Figure 1: Rings Method
figure-example_problems.R
Figure 2: Example of Problems with Ad-Hoc Ring Selection
figure-example_problems.R
Figure 3: Price Gradient of Distance from Offender
analysis-linden_rockoff.R
Figure 4: Effects of Offender Arrival on Home Prices (Linden and Rockoff 2008)
analysis-linden_rockoff.R
helper-nonparametric_rings_estimator.R
helper-parametric_rings_estimator.R
helper-plot_rings.R
Table 1: Monte Carlo Simulations
analysis-simulations.R
Citation
@article{butts2023jue,
title={JUE Insight: Difference-in-differences with geocoded microdata},
author={Butts, Kyle},
journal={Journal of Urban Economics},
volume={133},
pages={103493},
year={2023},
publisher={Elsevier}
}