You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
CNN-Based Single-Image Super-Resolution of Satellite Images
This repository contains the results for "A Comparative Study on CNN-Based Single-Image Super-Resolution Techniques for Satellite Images". You can find the trained models in the Releases section of the repository. All experiments have been performed using the original implementations, which have been linked in the table below. Check out this english article or the گزارش فارسی for more details on the project.
Compared Techniques
Based on their novelty and reported performances, we have chosen the following techniques for this study, sorted by their earliest draft publication date:
Li et al., Gated Multiple Feedback Network (GMFN) (repo)
Mei et al., Cross-Scale Non-Local Network (CSNLN) (repo)
Performance Evaluation
Training and evaluation of the techniques has been done on a Tesla P100 GPU, using the PyTorch library, while the bicubic interpolation algorithm has been run on a Core i7-9500H CPU, with the tools provided by the Scikit-Image library. The results for the models marked with an * have been directly lifted from our baseline article.
Scale
Model
PSNR
SSIM
Weights (Millions)
Training Time (Hours)
Inference Time (Seconds)
2
Bi-cubic Interpolation*
34.01
0.938
0
0
0.5
SRCNN*
36.79
0.960
-
-
-
VDSR*
37.94
0.967
-
-
-
SRGAN*
37.69
0.963
-
-
-
EEGAN*
38.82
0.973
-
-
-
CSNLN
39.87
0.976
3.06
112
104
DRLN
39.87
0.976
34.43
5
7.5
GMFN
39.49
0.974
9.75
13
3
RCAN
39.83
0.976
15.44
11
19.5
RDN
39.75
0.976
22.12
1.5
3
SRFBN
39.49
0.974
2.14
10.5
5
3
Bi-cubic Interpolation*
30.52
0.870
0
0
0.5
SRCNN*
32.44
0.906
-
-
-
VDSR*
33.69
0.924
-
-
-
SRGAN*
33.70
0.919
-
-
-
EEGAN*
34.84
0.936
-
-
-
CSNLN
35.39
0.936
6.01
57
53
DRLN
35.22
0.932
34.61
3
7
GMFN
35.26
0.932
9.80
11
1
RCAN
35.24
0.932
15.63
6.5
14
RDN
35.19
0.933
22.31
1.5
2.5
SRFBN
35.18
0.931
2.83
9
2.5
4
Bi-cubic Interpolation*
28.54
0.808
0
0
0.5
SRCNN*
30.06
0.848
-
-
-
VDSR*
31.06
0.874
-
-
-
SRGAN*
31.17
0.882
-
-
-
EEGAN*
32.36
0.898
-
-
-
CSNLN
32.84
0.885
6.57
107
182
DRLN
32.87
0.885
34.58
2.68
6.5
GMFN
32.96
0.887
9.86
10
0.5
RCAN
32.90
0.886
15.59
3.5
12
RDN
32.89
0.887
22.27
1.5
2
SRFBN
32.82
0.884
3.63
10
2
Visual Comparison
The following shows a single image, being down-scaled and then reconstructed, first using the Bicubic interpolation, and
then using the trained SISR models.
About
A Comparative Study on CNN-Based Single-Image Super-Resolution techniques for Satellite Images.