Fun fact, it's PR 404 not found.

Thanks for the patches @melroy89! I pushed minor corrections to doc/ChangeLog as that file is more-or-less about which developer updated/reviewed the work and while you did the work, you technically did not merge the changes. You'll get all the kudos though.

Right, I don't know how to handle this situation now. I'll let another dev handle it. Still, thank you for the work. @wtoorop, @wcawijngaards, @gthess, care to pitch in here? I'm not against @melroy89 stating his name in doc/ChangeLog, but I'm assuming that it's also about which developer employee reviewed/merged?

Right, I don't know how to handle this situation now. I'll let another dev handle it. Still, thank you for the work. @wtoorop, @wcawijngaards, @gthess, care to pitch in here? I'm not against @melroy89 stating his name in doc/ChangeLog, but I'm assuming that it's also about which developer employee reviewed/merged?

Sorry if I got that wrong. I'm new here, but I thought the changelog is stated who did the change. Right? I'm confused indeed.

@k0ekk0ek anyhow I changed it back to jeroen if that is how the changelog works. 😅

This works just fine, thanks @wtoorop! @melroy89, are you happy with the outcome? (The release notes is where we usually thank contributors (in my experience), and we still can, but this works too)

Yes please merge 😁 so the docs is fixed again.

Great! Thanks for figuring out the |version| stuff in the documentation 👍 Definitely a nice improvement.

No problem.

The warnings about WARNING: unknown option: '-c' you see, are all the places in the rst files where :option: is used actually. Which I think allows us to define some page with the available options? Which is either not in place now, or incomplete.

Do we need to extend: https://nsd.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/latest/reference/configure-options.html ? Or introduce another page?