ctsm1.0.dev001 included the following answer changes:

• Larger than roundoff-level changes expected from the following:
  • Include qflx_h2osfc_surf in BGC code: expected to be same climate
  • Two changes just affecting VIC
  • A change just affecting the QOVER diagnostic field
• Additional changes believed to be roundoff-level

June 28, 2018, @olyson ran the ensemble consistency test against release-clm5.0.01 (I'm not sure if this was the 9-timestep F compset UF-ECT, or the 1-year B compset ECT).

Should we do more thorough testing on this tag to ensure that it hasn't changed answers relative to release-clm5.0.01? e.g., should we do longer runs and run the diagnostics package on this, or should we run the 1-year ECT if only the UF-ECT was run?