HTTP/1.1 200 OK Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 20:03:38 GMT Server: Apache Content-Security-Policy: upgrade-insecure-requests Vary: Accept-Encoding Accept-Ranges: bytes Cache-Control: max-age=2592000 Expires: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 20:03:38 GMT Content-Encoding: gzip X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN Referrer-Policy: origin-when-cross-origin Transfer-Encoding: chunked Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Language: en Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=48211200; preload ICANN

[stld-rfp-mail] Chronological Index

Thread Index 1 (backward)           ( 1 )    >    (forward) 2 2004 May 15 ASCR REPLY: Response from the Anti-Spam Community Registry ASCRegistry 2004 May 12 Why .mail is unworkable Stephen Lange Ranzini 2004 May 04 Re: AHBL threatens to blacklist .mail if ICANN grants it Andrew D Kirch dot mail is good idea BUT small nonprofit should be exempt from $2000 dollar charge ! Jim Watson 2004 May 02 This is what i think ... allan holdsworth .mail TLD Andrew D Kirch 2004 Apr 30 A More Broadly Based Approach Is Needed Ross Elliot Comments from JPNIC Domain Name Policy Study Group dom-sec 2004 Apr 24 Comments on the new .mail TLD proposal Fu 2004 Apr 19 Please do it for the children John Caballero 2004 Apr 18 Propose change to .Mail to make it more useful and feasible AccuSpam We hope .Mail is approved... AccuSpam I strongly approve of .mail, but... Herbie Robinson 2004 Apr 17 .Mail is unnecessary (already been mostly tried and failed) AccuSpam AccuSpam Rebuttal to [ASCR REPLY: Individual responses from the Anti-Spam Community Registry] AccuSpam 2004 Apr 16 .mail comments Mark Healey 2004 Apr 15 More reasons NOT to approve dot .mail Greg Krajewski Proposal for .mail domains Steve Watne ASCR REPLY: Individual responses from the Anti-Spam Community Registry ASCRegistry 2004 Apr 13 About time!! AJ Musgrove Ouch John E. Peterson .mail TLD a good idea Thomas Burns We are NOT against .mail proposal AccuSpam Simple explanation of technical ramifications of .mail proposal AccuSpam Hooray Brian Conboy 2004 Apr 12 The $2000 fee is not the biggest problem AccuSpam AccuSpam rebuttal to [ASCR REPLY: Response from the Anti-Spam Community Registry] AccuSpam I am against the dot Mail sTLD Greg Krajewski $2000 Fee for .MAIL Seems Excessive Pat Pfeifer Not good laurel In response to The Max is $2000... cward .mail fails the basic theoretical test for anti-spam AccuSpam ASCR REPLY: Response from the Anti-Spam Community Registry ASCRegistry 2004 Apr 11 The .MAIL Proposal Daniel R. Tobias $2000 Entry Fee Not the Solution Bruce Behnke Bad idea TJ Downes Burden Again Placed on Recipient Jeff Breitner Good idea Adolf von Wurttemberg .mail domain implementation is seriously flawed Roy Leban Customer Service and how is the $2,000 spent Geoff Brookins 2004 Apr 10 Proposed registration fee too high Dave Nechodom $2000 Registration AlisaPhillips The Max is $2000... HwaRang 2004 Apr 09 Please do this... Steve .mail LaFayette Rehab Domain Cost $2000 Zmeyr, Dave .Mail proposal Mike Harrell Comments Eric Hutcheson \(Home\) .mail jgodwin A better solution Spooksters Proposed .mail solution for spam dennis .Mail Objections Greg J. Kozick Punishing the innocent Andrew Dowling .mail opinion Ginger Public Comments for .mail TLD Proposal Nasser Dassi .mail Domain name Cory Osborn .mail proposal Russell Wilson About the mail TLD Kent Snelson Objection over $2000 registration price Bil .mail comments Copy Caps Custom Baseball Caps 1 (backward)           ( 1 )    >    (forward) 2 Mails in Archive: 74 Mails per page: 60 Archive Last Updated: 2004 May 18 22:56:43 (UTC)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy