| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 20:41:42 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-security-policy: default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' data: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ https://www.ietf.org/ https://ietf.org/ https://analytics.ietf.org https://static.ietf.org; frame-ancestors 'self' ietf.org *.ietf.org meetecho.com *.meetecho.com
cross-origin-opener-policy: unsafe-none
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
strict-transport-security: max-age=3600; includeSubDomains
vary: Cookie, Accept-Encoding
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cf-cache-status: REVALIDATED
expires: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 00:41:42 GMT
cache-control: public, max-age=14400
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 95f3d7a3587ccb77-BLR
content-encoding: gzip
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-29
Skip to main content
IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-29
IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-29
review-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-29-opsdir-lc-fioccola-2025-06-17-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 30) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-06-18 | |
| Requested | 2025-06-07 | |
| Requested by | Mohamed Boucadair | |
| Authors | Greg White , Thomas Fossati , Ruediger Geib | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-06-30 (Latest revision 2025-06-30) | |
| Completed reviews |
Intdir Early review of -23
by Benson Muite
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -29 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -29 by Robert Sparks (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -29 by Kyle Rose (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -29 by Giuseppe Fioccola (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Giuseppe Fioccola |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-nqb by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/K1387-r5SKLwexfl0JCxTzON0mk | |
| Reviewed revision | 29 (document currently at 30) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-06-17 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-nqb-29-opsdir-lc-fioccola-2025-06-17-00
This document specifies a Non-Queue-Building Per-Hop Behavior (NQB PHB) in order to provide a separate queue for application-limited traffic microflows, allowing to avoid the queuing delays and losses caused by other traffic. This document has been developed primarily for access network segments and recommends a specific DSCP to identify NQB microflows. It also updates RFC 8325. From an OPSDIR point of view, it is good to have Section 4, 6 and 7. Even if the information is spread among these different sections, they provide guidance for networks that forward traffic marked with the NQB DSCP and for networks that do not currently support the NQB PHB. I think that the document has a clear scope and is almost ready for publication, but I have a couple of suggestions: - I think that section 5 on NQB PHB Requirements could be moved before section 4. Also, since section 4.1 explains NQB Sender Requirements, it can be placed under section 5. - To improve structure and clarity, you can probably consider to merge section 4 and section 6 since some information is shared such as the configuration recommendations. A whole section on the Operational and Management aspects as result of the merge would work better in my opinion.