| CARVIEW |
Select Language
HTTP/2 200
date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 09:41:23 GMT
content-type: text/html; charset=utf-8
content-security-policy: default-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' data: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ https://www.ietf.org/ https://ietf.org/ https://analytics.ietf.org https://static.ietf.org; frame-ancestors 'self' ietf.org *.ietf.org meetecho.com *.meetecho.com
cross-origin-opener-policy: unsafe-none
referrer-policy: strict-origin-when-cross-origin
strict-transport-security: max-age=3600; includeSubDomains
vary: Cookie, Accept-Encoding
x-content-type-options: nosniff
x-frame-options: SAMEORIGIN
cf-cache-status: MISS
expires: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:41:23 GMT
cache-control: public, max-age=14400
server: cloudflare
cf-ray: 95f0106398c6c190-BLR
content-encoding: gzip
alt-svc: h3=":443"; ma=86400
IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-12
Skip to main content
IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-12
IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-12
review-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-12-dnsdir-lc-rose-2025-06-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | DNS Directorate (dnsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-06-10 | |
| Requested | 2025-05-27 | |
| Authors | Aritra Banerjee , Tirumaleswar Reddy.K , Dimitrios Schoinianakis , Tim Hollebeek , Mike Ounsworth | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-07-02 (Latest revision 2025-07-01) | |
| Completed reviews |
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -12
by Scott Rose
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -12 by Thomas Fossati (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -12 by Vidhi Goel (diff) Artart Telechat review of -13 by Thomas Fossati |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Scott Rose |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers by DNS Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsdir/Lr1jo1EmPGqemjuqPxdWSOr4_RQ | |
| Reviewed revision | 12 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2025-06-02 |
review-ietf-pquip-pqc-engineers-12-dnsdir-lc-rose-2025-06-02-00
Ready with nits 1. There appears to be a tone contradiction between sections 1 and 2.1 about symmetric crypto and Grover’s algorithm. Section 1 states that the risk of CRQCs to symmetric crypto can be mitigated by doubling the key or digest length. Then section 2.1 calls this a “common misconception”. This is more of a tone/language comment and not a technical comment. Maybe change the Introduction text to say the risk may not apply everywhere, but where it does, doubling the key length or digest mitigates it. 2. Sec 10.5, the RFC that specifies how signatures are generated for RRSIG DNS records is RFC 4034, though since it is an informative reference, it doesn’t really matter.