Frequently asked questions

How is ExternalDNS useful to me?

You've probably created many deployments. Typically, you expose your deployment to the Internet by creating a Service with type=LoadBalancer. Depending on your environment, this usually assigns a random publicly available endpoint to your service that you can access from anywhere in the world. On Google Kubernetes Engine, this is a public IP address:

$ kubectl get svc
NAME      CLUSTER-IP     EXTERNAL-IP     PORT(S)        AGE
nginx     10.3.249.226   35.187.104.85   80:32281/TCP   1m

But dealing with IPs for service discovery isn't nice, so you register this IP with your DNS provider under a better name—most likely, one that corresponds to your service name. If the IP changes, you update the DNS record accordingly.

Those times are over! ExternalDNS takes care of that last step for you by keeping your DNS records synchronized with your external entry points.

ExternalDNS' usefulness also becomes clear when you use Ingresses to allow external traffic into your cluster. Via Ingress, you can tell Kubernetes to route traffic to different services based on certain HTTP request attributes, e.g. the Host header:

$ kubectl get ing
NAME         HOSTS                                      ADDRESS         PORTS     AGE
entrypoint   frontend.example.org,backend.example.org   35.186.250.78   80        1m

But there's nothing that actually makes clients resolve those hostnames to the Ingress' IP address. Again, you normally have to register each entry with your DNS provider. Only if you're lucky can you use a wildcard, like in the example above.

ExternalDNS can solve this for you as well.

Which DNS providers are supported?

Please check the provider status table for the list of supported providers and their status.

As stated in the README, we are currently looking for stable maintainers for those providers, to ensure that bugfixes and new features will be available for all of those.

Which Kubernetes objects are supported?

Services exposed via type=LoadBalancer, type=ExternalName, type=NodePort, and for the hostnames defined in Ingress objects as well as headless hostPort services.

How do I specify a DNS name for my Kubernetes objects?

There are three sources of information for ExternalDNS to decide on DNS name. ExternalDNS will pick one in order as listed below:

For ingress objects ExternalDNS will create a DNS record based on the hosts specified for the ingress object, as well as the external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname annotation.
- For services ExternalDNS will look for the annotation external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname on the service and use the loadbalancer IP, it also will look for the annotation external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/internal-hostname on the service and use the service IP.
- For ingresses, you can optionally force ExternalDNS to create records based on either the hosts specified or the external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname annotation. This behavior is controlled by setting the external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/ingress-hostname-source annotation on that ingress to either defined-hosts-only or annotation-only.
If compatibility mode is enabled (e.g. --compatibility={mate,molecule} flag), External DNS will parse annotations used by Zalando/Mate, wearemolecule/route53-kubernetes. Compatibility mode with Kops DNS Controller is planned to be added in the future.
If --fqdn-template flag is specified, e.g. --fqdn-template={{.Name}}.my-org.com, ExternalDNS will use service/ingress specifications for the provided template to generate DNS name.

Which Service and Ingress controllers are supported?

Regarding Services, we'll support the OSI Layer 4 load balancers that Kubernetes creates on AWS and Google Kubernetes Engine, and possibly other clusters running on Google Compute Engine.

Regarding Ingress, we'll support:

Google's Ingress Controller on GKE that integrates with their Layer 7 load balancers (GLBC)
nginx-ingress-controller v0.9.x with a fronting Service
Zalando's AWS Ingress controller, based on AWS ALBs and Skipper
Traefik
- version 1.7, when kubernetes.ingressEndpoint is configured (kubernetes.ingressEndpoint.useDefaultPublishedService in the Helm chart)
- versions >=2.0, when providers.kubernetesIngress.ingressEndpoint is configured (providers.kubernetesIngress.publishedService.enabled is set to true in the new Helm chart)

Are other Ingress Controllers supported?

For Ingress objects, ExternalDNS will attempt to discover the target hostname of the relevant Ingress Controller automatically. If you are using an Ingress Controller that is not listed above you may have issues with ExternalDNS not discovering Endpoints and consequently not creating any DNS records. As a workaround, it is possible to force create an Endpoint by manually specifying a target host/IP for the records to be created by setting the annotation external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/target in the Ingress object.

Another reason you may want to override the ingress hostname or IP address is if you have an external mechanism for handling failover across ingress endpoints. Possible scenarios for this would include using keepalived-vip to manage failover faster than DNS TTLs might expire.

Note that if you set the target to a hostname, then a CNAME record will be created. In this case, the hostname specified in the Ingress object's annotation must already exist. (i.e. you have a Service resource for your Ingress Controller with the external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname annotation set to the same value)

What about other projects similar to ExternalDNS?

ExternalDNS is a joint effort to unify different projects accomplishing the same goals, namely:

Kops' DNS Controller
Zalando's Mate
Molecule Software's route53-kubernetes

We strive to make the migration from these implementations a smooth experience. This means that, for some time, we'll support their annotation semantics in ExternalDNS and allow both implementations to run side-by-side. This enables you to migrate incrementally and slowly phase out the other implementation.

How does it work with other implementations and legacy records?

ExternalDNS will allow you to opt into any Services and Ingresses that you want it to consider, by an annotation. This way, it can co-exist with other implementations running in the same cluster if they also support this pattern. However, we'll most likely declare ExternalDNS to be the default implementation. This means that ExternalDNS will consider Services and Ingresses that don't specifically declare which controller they want to be processed by; this is similar to the ingress.class annotation on GKE.

I'm afraid you will mess up my DNS records

Since v0.3, ExternalDNS can be configured to use an ownership registry. When this option is enabled, ExternalDNS will keep track of which records it has control over, and will never modify any records over which it doesn't have control. This is a fundamental requirement to operate ExternalDNS safely when there might be other actors creating DNS records in the same target space.

For now ExternalDNS uses TXT records to label owned records, and there might be other alternatives coming in the future releases.

Does anyone use ExternalDNS in production?

Yes, multiple companies are using ExternalDNS in production. Zalando, as an example, has been using it in production since its v0.3 release, mostly using the AWS provider.

How can we start using ExternalDNS?

Check out the following descriptive tutorials on how to run ExternalDNS in GKE and AWS or any other supported provider.

Why is ExternalDNS only adding a single IP address in Route 53 on AWS when using the `nginx-ingress-controller` ?

By default the nginx-ingress-controller assigns a single IP address to an Ingress resource when it's created. ExternalDNS uses what's assigned to the Ingress resource, so it too will use this single IP address when adding the record in Route 53.

How do I get it to use the FQDN of the ELB assigned to my `nginx-ingress-controller` Service instead?

In most AWS deployments, you'll instead want the Route 53 entry to be the FQDN of the ELB that is assigned to the nginx-ingress-controller Service. To accomplish this, when you create the nginx-ingress-controller Deployment, you need to provide the --publish-service option to the /nginx-ingress-controller executable under args. Once this is deployed new Ingress resources will get the ELB's FQDN and ExternalDNS will use the same when creating records in Route 53.

According to the nginx-ingress-controller docs the value you need to provide --publish-service is:

Service fronting the ingress controllers. Takes the form namespace/name. The controller will set the endpoint records on the ingress objects to reflect those on the service.

For example if your nginx-ingress-controller Service's name is nginx-ingress-controller-svc and it's in the default namespace the start of your resource YAML might look like the following. Note the second to last line.

apiVersion: apps/v1
kind: Deployment
metadata:
  name: nginx-ingress-controller
spec:
  replicas: 1
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: nginx-ingress
  template:
    metadata:
      labels:
        app: nginx-ingress
    spec:
      hostNetwork: false
      containers:
        - name: nginx-ingress-controller
          image: "gcr.io/google_containers/nginx-ingress-controller:0.9.0-beta.11"
          imagePullPolicy: "IfNotPresent"
          args:
            - /nginx-ingress-controller
            - --default-backend-service={your-backend-service}
            - --publish-service=default/nginx-ingress-controller-svc
            - --configmap={your-configmap}

I have a Service/Ingress but it's ignored by ExternalDNS. Why?

ExternalDNS can be configured to only use Services or Ingresses as source. In case Services or Ingresses seem to be ignored in your setup, consider checking how the flag --source was configured when deployed. For reference, see the issue #267.

I'm using an ELB with TXT registry but the CNAME record clashes with the TXT record. How to avoid this?

CNAMEs cannot co-exist with other records, therefore you can use the --txt-prefix flag which makes sure to create a TXT record with a name following the pattern prefix.<CNAME record>. For reference, see the issue #262.

Can I force ExternalDNS to create CNAME records for ELB/ALB?

The default logic is: when a target looks like an ELB/ALB, ExternalDNS will create ALIAS records for it. Under certain circumstances you want to force ExternalDNS to create CNAME records instead. If you want to do that, start ExternalDNS with the --aws-prefer-cname flag.

Why should I want to force ExternalDNS to create CNAME records for ELB/ALB? Some motivations of users were:

"Our hosted zones records are synchronized with our enterprise DNS. The record type ALIAS is an AWS proprietary record type and AWS allows you to set a DNS record directly on AWS resources. Since this is not a DNS RfC standard and therefore can not be transferred and created in our enterprise DNS. So we need to force CNAME creation instead."

or

"In case of ALIAS if we do nslookup with domain name, it will return only IPs of ELB. So it is always difficult for us to locate ELB in AWS console to which domain is pointing. If we configure it with CNAME it will return exact ELB CNAME, which is more helpful.!"

Which permissions do I need when running ExternalDNS on a GCE or GKE node

You need to add either https://www.googleapis.com/auth/ndev.clouddns.readwrite or https://www.googleapis.com/auth/cloud-platform on your instance group's scope.

How can I run ExternalDNS under a specific GCP Service Account, e.g. to access DNS records in other projects?

Have a look at https://github.com/linki/mate/blob/v0.6.2/examples/google/README.md#permissions

How do I configure multiple Sources via environment variables? (also applies to domain filters)

Separate the individual values via a line break. The equivalent of --source=service --source=ingress would be service\ningress. However, it can be tricky do define that depending on your environment. The following examples work (zsh):

Via docker:

$ docker run \
  -e EXTERNAL_DNS_SOURCE=$'service\ningress' \
  -e EXTERNAL_DNS_PROVIDER=google \
  -e EXTERNAL_DNS_DOMAIN_FILTER=$'foo.com\nbar.com' \
  registry.k8s.io/external-dns/external-dns:v0.18.0
time="2017-08-08T14:10:26Z" level=info msg="config: &{APIServerURL: KubeConfig: Sources:[service ingress] Namespace: ...

Locally:

$ export EXTERNAL_DNS_SOURCE=$'service\ningress'
$ external-dns --provider=google
INFO[0000] config: &{APIServerURL: KubeConfig: Sources:[service ingress] Namespace: ...

$ EXTERNAL_DNS_SOURCE=$'service\ningress' external-dns --provider=google
INFO[0000] config: &{APIServerURL: KubeConfig: Sources:[service ingress] Namespace: ...

In a Kubernetes manifest:

spec:
  containers:
  - name: external-dns
    args:
    - --provider=google
    env:
    - name: EXTERNAL_DNS_SOURCE
      value: "service\ningress"

Or preferably:

spec:
  containers:
  - name: external-dns
    args:
    - --provider=google
    env:
    - name: EXTERNAL_DNS_SOURCE
      value: |-
        service
        ingress

Running an internal and external dns service

Sometimes you need to run an internal and an external dns service. The internal one should provision hostnames used on the internal network (perhaps inside a VPC), and the external one to expose DNS to the internet.

To do this with ExternalDNS you can use the --ingress-class flag to specifically tie an instance of ExternalDNS to an instance of a ingress controller. Let's assume you have two ingress controllers, internal and external. You can then start two ExternalDNS providers, one with --ingress-class=internal and one with --ingress-class=external.

If you need to search for multiple ingress classes, you can specify the flag multiple times, like so: --ingress-class=internal --ingress-class=external.

The --ingress-class flag will check both the spec.ingressClassName field and the deprecated kubernetes.io/ingress.class annotation. The spec.ingressClassName tasks precedence over the annotation if both are supplied.

Backward compatibility

The previous --annotation-filter flag can still be used to restrict which objects ExternalDNS considers; for example, --annotation-filter=kubernetes.io/ingress.class in (public,dmz).

However, beware when using annotation filters with multiple sources, e.g. --source=service --source=ingress, since --annotation-filter will filter every given source object. If you need to use annotation filters against a specific source you have to run a separated external dns service containing only the wanted --source and --annotation-filter.

Note: the --ingress-class flag cannot be used at the same time as the --annotation-filter=kubernetes.io/ingress.class in (...) flag; if you do this an error will be raised.

Performance considerations

Filtering based on ingress class name or annotations means that the external-dns controller will receive all resources of that kind and then filter on the client-side. In larger clusters with many resources which change frequently this can cause performance issues. If only some resources need to be managed by an instance of external-dns then label filtering can be used instead of ingress class filtering (or legacy annotation filtering). This means that only those resources which match the selector specified in --label-filter will be passed to the controller.

How do I specify that I want the DNS record to point to either the Node's public or private IP when it has both?

If your Nodes have both public and private IP addresses, you might want to write DNS records with one or the other. For example, you may want to write a DNS record in a private zone that resolves to your Nodes' private IPs so that traffic never leaves your private network.

To accomplish this, set this annotation on your service: external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/access=private Conversely, to force the public IP: external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/access=public

If this annotation is not set, and the node has both public and private IP addresses, then the public IP will be used by default.

Some loadbalancer implementations assign multiple IP addresses as external addresses. You can filter the generated targets by their networks using --target-net-filter=10.0.0.0/8 or --exclude-target-net=10.0.0.0/8.

Can external-dns manage(add/remove) records in a hosted zone which is setup in different AWS account?

Yes, give it the correct cross-account/assume-role permissions and use the --aws-assume-role flag #524 (comment)

How do I provide multiple values to the annotation `external-dns.alpha.kubernetes.io/hostname`?

Separate them by ,.

Are there official Docker images provided?

When we tag a new release, we push a container image to the Kubernetes projects official container registry with the following name:

registry.k8s.io/external-dns/external-dns

As tags, you use the external-dns release of choice(i.e. v0.7.6). A latest tag is not provided in the container registry.

If you wish to build your own image, you can use the provided .ko.yaml as a starting point.

Which architectures are supported?

From v0.7.5 on we support amd64, arm32v7 and arm64v8. This means that you can run ExternalDNS on a Kubernetes cluster backed by Rasperry Pis or on ARM instances in the cloud as well as more traditional machines backed by amd64 compatible CPUs.

Which operating systems are supported?

At the time of writing we only support GNU/linux and we have no plans of supporting Windows or other operating systems.

Why am I seeing time out errors even though I have connectivity to my cluster?

If you're seeing an error such as this:

FATA[0060] failed to sync cache: timed out waiting for the condition

You may not have the correct permissions required to query all the necessary resources in your kubernetes cluster. Specifically, you may be running in a namespace that you don't have these permissions in. By default, commands are run against the default namespace. Try changing this to your particular namespace to see if that fixes the issue.

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!